Structural Issues in Traditional Market and Payment System
π’ Platform-Centric & Exclusionary Revenue Structures
Today's distribution and payment systems operate on centralized platforms that exclude consumer participation.
β Consumers receive no rewards for engagement.
β Creators rely on opaque algorithms to earn income.
β Merchants face high fees and delayed settlements.
β Centralized data systems result in erosion of trust.
These issues stand in direct conflict with the participatory and decentralized values of the Web 3.0 eraβrevealing the urgent need for structural transformation.
π³ Centralized Control by Payment Giants
Most payment systems today are controlled by financial behemoths such as:
Visa
MasterCard
Google Pay
Apple Pay
PayPal
These few entities monopolize transaction data and payment infrastructure, leading to:
β οΈ Restricted consumer choice
πΈ Inefficient cost structures for both merchants and users
π Over-dependence on centralized platforms
Merchants often have no alternative but to accept high transaction fees and unfavorable terms just to gain access.
π Complex, Costly, and Delayed Transactions
Traditional payment flows involve 7 to 10 intermediaries, including:
Card issuers
Banks
Payment gateways
Authentication services
Each layer adds:
π§Ύ Extra fees
β³ Settlement delays (up to 30 days)
π° Reduced merchant margins
π Increased consumer prices
This complexity disproportionately affects SMEs, which depend on fast liquidity and predictable cash flow.
π Security Risks & Trust Deficit
Centralized systems depend on single-point servers, making them vulnerable to:
π‘οΈ External cyberattacks
π Internal data breaches
π§Ύ Sensitive data exposure (e.g., card numbers, expiration dates, personal credentials)
Victims of fraud often face burdensome and slow dispute processes, undermining trust in the entire system.
π§ Why a New Model is Needed
The traditional payment system suffers from:
β Centralized governance
β Costly and opaque fee layers
β Long settlement periods
β Inherent security vulnerabilities
These limitations signal the need for a decentralized, transparent, and user-centric alternativeβaligned with the principles of Web 3.0 and tokenized economies.

Last updated