Structural Issues in Traditional Market and Payment System

🏒 Platform-Centric & Exclusionary Revenue Structures

Today's distribution and payment systems operate on centralized platforms that exclude consumer participation.

  • ❌ Consumers receive no rewards for engagement.

  • ❌ Creators rely on opaque algorithms to earn income.

  • ❌ Merchants face high fees and delayed settlements.

  • ❌ Centralized data systems result in erosion of trust.

These issues stand in direct conflict with the participatory and decentralized values of the Web 3.0 eraβ€”revealing the urgent need for structural transformation.


πŸ’³ Centralized Control by Payment Giants

Most payment systems today are controlled by financial behemoths such as:

  • Visa

  • MasterCard

  • Google Pay

  • Apple Pay

  • PayPal

These few entities monopolize transaction data and payment infrastructure, leading to:

  • ⚠️ Restricted consumer choice

  • πŸ’Έ Inefficient cost structures for both merchants and users

  • πŸ”’ Over-dependence on centralized platforms

Merchants often have no alternative but to accept high transaction fees and unfavorable terms just to gain access.


πŸ”„ Complex, Costly, and Delayed Transactions

Traditional payment flows involve 7 to 10 intermediaries, including:

  • Card issuers

  • Banks

  • Payment gateways

  • Authentication services

Each layer adds:

  • 🧾 Extra fees

  • ⏳ Settlement delays (up to 30 days)

  • πŸ’° Reduced merchant margins

  • πŸ“ˆ Increased consumer prices

This complexity disproportionately affects SMEs, which depend on fast liquidity and predictable cash flow.


πŸ”“ Security Risks & Trust Deficit

Centralized systems depend on single-point servers, making them vulnerable to:

  • πŸ›‘οΈ External cyberattacks

  • πŸ” Internal data breaches

  • 🧾 Sensitive data exposure (e.g., card numbers, expiration dates, personal credentials)

Victims of fraud often face burdensome and slow dispute processes, undermining trust in the entire system.


🧭 Why a New Model is Needed

The traditional payment system suffers from:

  • ❗ Centralized governance

  • ❗ Costly and opaque fee layers

  • ❗ Long settlement periods

  • ❗ Inherent security vulnerabilities

These limitations signal the need for a decentralized, transparent, and user-centric alternativeβ€”aligned with the principles of Web 3.0 and tokenized economies.

Last updated